The AI Justice Atlas provides examples of the use and regulation of AI-based technologies in criminal proceedings across selected jurisdictions and is not intended to be exhaustive. The scope of the research is limited to express and identifiable mentions of AI in official sources and does not necessarily capture broader or implied uses or regulation. This tool also does not cover the use of AI in civil proceedings unless otherwise indicated.

The material collected in this mapping tool is intended for general information purposes only and must not be used as a substitute for professional or legal advice. It is updated periodically but may not reflect the most recent developments. The Oxford Institute of Technology and Justice, the University of Oxford, the Clooney Foundation for Justice, and their representatives, as well as the law firms and lawyers that have contributed to this mapping tool make no guarantees or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in the mapping tool and exclude liability for any loss or other result arising from any reliance placed on information presented in this mapping tool.

The Oxford Institute of Technology and Justice is grateful to all those who contribute to the AI Justice Atlas. We benefit from the insights of judges, public officials, and other practitioners interviewed on the use of AI tools in their jurisdictions. We thank the following law firms and lawyers for providing legal information used to create the summaries in the Atlas and endorsement of these summaries. In particular we thank Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP (China, India, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States), Freshfields US LLP (Estonia, Spain, Turkey), Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia), Mr Nasser Al Osaiba of Global Advocacy and Legal Counsel (UAE), Mr Sanjeev Kapoor of Khaitan & Co (India), Paksoy (Turkey), Sorainen (Estonia), Webber Wentzel (South Africa), and Mr Wesley Mwafulirwa (Malawi).